Skip to main content

To Look at The Queen: An American Looks at Britain

The British Royal Family. Image: AP
A surprise in Britain is how easy it is to see the Queen. Her daily round of ceremonial ribbon-cutting and orphanage going is posted in the Court Appointments column in The Times. All you have to do is show up right on time and join the onlookers.

Another surprise in Britain when you go around some miserable slum is how Prince Charles has been there ahead of you. The Prince’s distant melancholy image is contradicted by the enthusiasm of public housing dwellers about the interest he takes in their problems. He has rightly accused Britain’s architects, who design prison-like housing estates and tower blocks, inspired by Le Corbusier and Mies van der Rohe, blight most British cities, of consistently ignoring the “feelings and wishes of the mass of ordinary people.”

When Prince Charles speaks out there are complaints that he should stay out of politics as if saying nothing doesn’t carry just as heavy a moral responsibility. What gives his views authority is like a good reporter, he goes out, mingles as much as he can, and asks, asks, asks. What better experience for a future King? Britain has peculiar need of somebody like this.

The Prince has said: “If you go around the country in my position, I’ve learned a lot, I’ve listened, I’ve looked a lot—you can’t just sit and do nothing about it.”

It can be argued that the British Royal Family’s real power lies in the very ability to influence the media. Royal correspondent Judy Wade says, “Without the media, the monarchy could have trouble staying in business.” Buckingham Palace with all its heraldry and chivalry, some of it going back to the days of William the Conqueror, has to strike a balance between serving the public, satisfying the appetite of its subjects for fairy-tale romance, and resisting a wholesale invasion of its privacy and the kind of attention that conflicts with its mystique.  

The British monarchy has always walked the tightrope on keeping on the good side of the press. “It is their single, real organ of power,” writes Charles Jenck in his 1988 book The Prince, The Architects and New Wave Monarchy.

In 2012, Queen Elizabeth II celebrated her 60th year on the throne, but through the years, there has been no serious talk of abolishing the monarchy. The cost of taxpayers’ money is great and nobody knows how much exactly the Queen really worth; estimates go from $100 mn to $100 bn. But certainly, the monarchy has been and will always be a great help to Britain’s unity and cohesion. And inevitably the Queen has power, just as Prince Charles, as the heir to the throne, has influence. Nothing in British history suggests that taking no action on public issues is to be neutral. Silence, too, sets the tone.

Adapted from An American Looks at Britain by Richard Critchfield. New York: Doubleday, c1990. 


  1. Quantum Binary Signals

    Get professional trading signals sent to your cell phone daily.

    Start following our signals NOW & make up to 270% per day.


Post a Comment

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Popular posts from this blog

10 Interesting Facts About Princess Margaret of United Kingdom, Countess of Snowdon

Princess Margaret Rose was one of the most popular, albeit controversial, royals during her lifetime. She was a rather sad figure, a victim of love at an early age and a person who constantly sought affection and attention as she went on to looked for the real meaning of her life. Might as well want to learn about the colorful life of Queen Elizabeth II's younger sister? Here are 10 interesting facts about her.

1. Born on August 30, 1930, in Glamis, the family seat of her mother's family, Princess Margaret was the first member of the British Royal Family to be born in Scotland for over 300 years.

2. Her parents, the then Duke and Duchess of York (later King George VI and Queen Elizabeth) wanted to call her Anne, but her grandfather, King George V, vetoed, so they named her Margaret Rose, instead.

3. In 1936, the princess' relatively peaceful life was altered considerably when his uncle, King Edward VIII, abdicated to marry the woman he loved, the two-time American divorce…

King Edward VIII’s Financial Settlement: How Much Money Did He Get After The Abdication?

King Edward VIII leaped into financial uncertainty the moment he signed the Instrument of Abdication on December 10, 1936. That same day, Edward, now known as Duke of Windsor, entered into an agreement with his younger brother and successor, King George VI, that secured him £25,000 annually for the rest of his life. However, the King later renounced this agreement and instead offered him a smaller amount which would cease upon the King's death. The condition is that Edward should never step into British soil unless invited by government.

The Private Residences of the British Royals

Let’s check out the privately-owned or leased residences of the members of the British Royal Family. The list does not include the state-owned residences, like Buckingham Palace or Windsor Castle, as well as those owned by the duchies of Cornwall and Lancaster.  This list, however, includes properties leased by members of the Royal Family for the purpose of having their own private residence.
Balmoral Castle

Balmoral Castle is the private residence of Queen Elizabeth II in Royal Deeside in Scotland. Purchased by Prince Albert in 1852, the property reminded him of his homeland, Thuringia, Germany. Prince Albert and Queen Victoria originally leased the property until the deal was sealed to purchase the estate for £32,000. The couple expanded the rather small house to fit in the growing family of the royal couple. Ownership of the property passed on to the eldest son (usually the sovereign). King Edward VIII retained ownership of Balmoral after his abdication. A financial settlement was …