Skip to main content

Concerned Prince Charles sought second opinion on troubled Diana after royal doctors believed she had mental disorder

Charles and Diana on their wedding day. Image: Flickr

Prince Charles asked for second opinion on the troubled late Princess of Wales after the Queen’s doctor thought she was suffering from a “dangerous” mental disorder that they fear she might pass on to her children, a letter revealed.

According to the Mail Online, their views are detailed in an extraordinary letter written in February 1983 by psychotherapist Dr. Alan McGlashan, who helped treat the Princess after she “distanced herself” from the royal physicians.

Sir John Battens diagnosed Diana while treating her and he was “plainly scared” and feared it she might cause a “dynastic disaster” which could be passed on to her offspring. A year earlier, Diana threw herself down the main staircase at Sandringham after a fight with Charles, eventually landing at the Queen’s feet. All this happened just a few months after Prince William was born. Then 21-year-old Diana was also believed to be suffering from bulimia, anxiety, depression, and low self-esteem.

Aside from Sir John, she was also treated by Michael Pare, head of St Bartholomew’s psychiatry department; Michael Linnett, Apothecary to the Household of the Prince and Princess of Wales; and a behaviorist, referred to in the letter only as ‘Mitchell’.
The princess eventually stopped seeing Batten’s team so a concerned Prince Charles sought help elsewhere. Charles turned to his mentor, South African-born writer-philosopher Laurens Van der Post, who advised Diana to check with his close friend and contemporary, Dr. Alan McGlashan. Diana shared with McGlashan that Batten and his team gave her anti-depressants and attempted to put her on behavioural therapy.  McGlashan, however, believed that Diana’s problem was not medical, but rather emotion. She was a “very unhappy girl” fighting an oppressive royal family.

“She is a normal girl whose troubles were emotional, not pathological,” McGlashan concludes.  "Her doctors had been treating her as a patient with an obscure and dangerous illness which baffled them... Her symptoms plainly scared them... She complained to me that they all treated her 'as if I were made of porcelain.'"

MgGlashan’s diagnosis came as a relief to Prince Charles. Prince Charles himself later spent 14 years in therapy with the psychiatrist, who died in 1998. A bust of him now stands in Highgrove, reports The Independent.

McGlashan's letters were unearthed during the research for the authorized biography of Van der Post.

Comments

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Popular posts from this blog

The Truth about “Princess Qajar,” the Royal Lady with the Mustache

A Persian Princess viral news websites baptized as Princess Qajar has lately become a stuff of legends. She was presented as a royal lady with a facial hair that made her so attracted that 13 men claimed their own lives because she couldn’t love them. The truth is, there is no “Princess Qajar,” but there is a the Qajar dynasty of Persia that ruled over Persian for more than a century.

The only fact about this historical meme is that at that time, it was fashionable for Persian women to wear mustache. “Many Persian-language sources, as well as photographs, from the nineteenth century confirm that Qajar women sported a thin mustache, or more accurately a soft down, as a sign of beauty,” explained Dr. Afsaneh Najmabadi.
The memes and fake stories circulating online refer not to a single princess, but actually to two female dynasts: Princess Fatemah Khanum"'Esmat al-Dowleh" and her half-sister, Princess Zahra Khanom Tadj es-Saltaneh. Their father, Naser al-Din Shah Qajar, …

Queen Mary and the Delhi Durbar Tiara

In 1911, King George V and Queen Mary were to be proclaimed Emperor and Empress of India. That was the first and only time that a British sovereign attended the durbar, which was hailed as the largest gathering of princes, noblemen and landed gentry in India to pay homage to their sovereigns. The King and Queen should never be outdone by the petty rulers. They were sure these local princes would come garbed with all the gold and diamonds from their treasure chest. It was decided that they should showcase the crown jewels with them. But British law prohibits anyone from taking these treasures outside Great Britain. A new set of coronation regalia  had to be made! Thus, the India Office commissioned Garrard and Co. to make the Imperial Crown of India for King George V. It has eight arches, with 6170 exquisitely cut diamonds, and covered with sapphires, emeralds and rubies, with a velvet and miniver cap all weighing 34.05 ounces (965 g).

However, Queen Mary was without the empress' …

Why Prince Harry is a Commoner?

Prince Harry is a commoner according to common law, explains royal expert Marlene Eilers Koenig in her blog.
“In the United Kingdom, the law is based on English COMMON law -- from where we get the word Commoner,” she explained. That puts Prince Harry under the rule of the normal law.
Only the sovereign (e.g. The Queen) and the peers of the realm are not commoners, she explained. The peerage of the United Kingdom is composed of, in order of precedence, Dukes, Marquesses, Earls, Viscounts, and Barons.
“That leaves everyone else, including princes and princesses, who have not been created peers of the realm,” Eilers continued to explain. Thus, even if Harry is a Prince of the United Kingdom, he is, by law, a commoner. In precedence, as the queen’s grandson, he ranks higher than the Duke of Norfolk, who is the premier duke in the peerage of England, but according to the law, the Duke of Norfolk is not a commoner, while Harry is is.
However, once he gets married, Her Majesty is highly …